tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5753748628649508682.post2028265181417139688..comments2010-05-13T02:55:34.594+02:00Daniel Pfeiferhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04365127655235703975noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5753748628649508682.post-74664146017676933242010-05-13T02:55:34.589+02:002010-05-13T02:55:34.589+02:00

My name is Laura Stevenson I was browsing internet and found your blog. The author did a great job. I will subscribe to your RSS feeds. Thank you for your contribution. I am a web designer myself. And here some examples of the websites that I designed for <a href="http://www.unclepaydayloan.com" rel="nofollow">bad credit loans</a> <a href="http://www.unclepaydayloan.com/payday-loan.shtml" rel="

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5753748628649508682.post-91910624605230280762008-07-27T19:54:00.000+02:002008-07-27T19:54:00.000+02:00

Just another thing. What JavaFX lacks today is a set of demos showing off the technology. And I mean impressive demos that don't show bubbles moving on the screen.<BR/><BR/>There is a Studiomoto demo (google it) that is supposed to show that you can do Flash style websites (which I do not doubt at all) with JavaFX, but the problem with that demo is that you need to download 5 MB of code after

Pepehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04187214533843924537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5753748628649508682.post-91353489986399016102008-07-27T15:14:00.000+02:002008-07-27T15:14:00.000+02:00

Hi pepe, that's correct! I meant to correct it before I posted it but it slipped my mind. Silverlight 2.0, to my knowledge, contains a minimal .NET Runtime but also adds a couple of megabytes to the download.<BR/><BR/>Also, I want to clearify that I am not bashing Silverlight nor Flex.

Danielhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04365127655235703975noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5753748628649508682.post-74014398591099732772008-07-27T15:01:00.000+02:002008-07-27T15:01:00.000+02:00

About the Silverlights 1.5 vs JavaFx 5 mb download, you mention that you would still need to have the .NET framework installed. This is not correct. Silverlight runs without it.

Pepehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04187214533843924537noreply@blogger.com